AITA for breaking up a relationship between our son and a girl, who both have disabilities?

hiltinp 1247 comments

In the quiet corners of a community bound by shared struggles and unwavering love, a mother wrestles with a heart-wrenching dilemma.

Her son, a vibrant 16-year-old with severe physical disabilities, has found affection in a girl whose world is shaped by profound mental and physical challenges.

What should be a celebration of young love is shadowed by her fears and doubts, as she confronts the stark contrast between their abilities and what the future might hold.

Surrounded by hopeful families who see nothing but promise in this union, she feels isolated in her apprehension, burdened by the weight of judgment and the label she fears she carries.

The tension between acceptance and protection pulls at her soul, revealing the raw, complex emotions that come with loving a child navigating a world that often refuses to understand their unique path.

AITA for breaking up a relationship between our son and a girl, who both have disabilities?
‘AITA for breaking up a relationship between our son and a girl, who both have disabilities?’

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.

From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:

The internet jumped in fast, delivering everything from kind advice to cold truth. It’s a mix of empathy, outrage, and no-nonsense takes.

The original poster (OP) and their husband face intense isolation from their close friends group after intervening in their son's relationship.

The core conflict lies between the parents' perceived duty to protect their non-disabled son from a potentially harmful situation, versus the son's strong emotional desire for the relationship and the group's overwhelming support for the couple.

Considering the son's significant physical vulnerability and the documented physical harm occurring, were the parents justified in definitively ending the relationship to ensure their son's safety and well-being, or did their intervention wrongly override their capable son's autonomy and right to choose his own romantic partner?