AITA for choosing my dog over my mom and her fiancé?
At just seventeen, he faces a heartbreaking battle between love and loss, caught in the storm of a family reshaped by tragedy.
His dog, Dax, is more than a pet—he’s a living memory of his late father, a companion who carried him through the darkest days after the accident that shattered their world.
But now, with a new man entering his mother’s life, the boy’s sanctuary is threatened. Forced to choose between loyalty to his father’s legacy and the harsh realities of change, he fights to save the one constant that still holds his family together.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The 17-year-old son found himself in a painful situation where his mother prioritized her fiancé's comfort, specifically his severe dog allergy, over the son's deep emotional attachment to his dog, Dax, which was a link to his deceased father.
The central conflict revolves around the perceived replacement of the biological father figure and the immediate ultimatum to remove the dog versus the son's need for emotional s**bility and continuity represented by Dax.
Given the irreversible move to his grandfather's home to stay with his dog, the core question remains: Is the son acting as a cruel or selfish individual by choosing to prioritize the relationship with his dog and maintaining a s**ble living arrangement over immediate reconciliation with his mother and her fiancé, or is this choice a necessary act of self-preservation following a significant loss?
From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:
When users weighed in, they held nothing back. It’s a raw, honest look at what people really think.