AITA for walking my friends’ under-exercised dog more than they usually do – which led to vet costs and now drama?
B’s story is one of quiet suffering masked by a sweet demeanor, a rescue dog emerging from darkness into a world that still fails to meet his deepest needs.
Despite the love of his new family, his restless energy and unmet cravings for exercise and stimulation paint a heartbreaking picture of a soul yearning for freedom and understanding.
When given the chance to truly thrive, even for just a weekend, B’s transformation was clear—calmer, happier, more alive.
But the sudden onset of pain and his owners’ swift concern cast a shadow of doubt and guilt, leaving those who care for him grappling with the painful question: is love enough when the wounds run deeper than the eye can see?
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) acted out of genuine concern for the well-being of a rescue dog, providing increased exercise that seemed to benefit the animal.
However, this action led to conflict when the dog experienced minor pain afterward, culminating in an accusation from one friend regarding the vet bill before the topic was even formally discussed.
Was the OP wrong for overstepping the friends' boundaries by significantly increasing the dog's exercise, or were the friends wrong to immediately jump to an accusation about financial responsibility rather than addressing the underlying concern about the dog's care?
Should care decisions for a pet always be dictated by the owner, even if those decisions appear inadequate for the animal's needs?
Users Wasted No Time Telling It Like It Is:
Users didn’t stay quiet — they showed up in full force, mixing support with sharp criticism. From calling out bad behavior to offering real talk, the comments lit up fast.