AITA for refusing to financially help my family after they abandoned me even if it means they’ll end up homeless?
Abandoned and forgotten, a young girl’s life unraveled in silence as she was sent away from her mother’s side, left to grow up with relatives who barely had enough for their own family.
Her heart ached with every missed call and rare visit, while the world she longed to be part of carried on without her—her mother’s new family thriving in a life she was cruelly excluded from.
Behind the screens of social media, she watched the life she should have shared slip further away, a stark contrast to her own lonely reality.
The pain of invisibility and separation carved deep wounds, leaving her to grapple with a profound sense of loss, longing, and the haunting question of where she truly belonged.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) is experiencing intense anger and conflict due to their mother and half-siblings resurfacing after years of absence, now demanding financial aid following the step-father's financial mismanagement.
The central conflict lies between the OP's justifiable desire to maintain distance and protect the life they built independently, versus the inherited familial obligation or perceived guilt being leveraged against them by the estranged family members.
Given the history of abandonment and the current aggressive outreach by the entire family unit, the core question remains: Does a biological relationship automatically mandate financial rescue, especially when the family unit provided no support during the OP's formative years, or does the OP have the absolute right to prioritize their own es**blished security and well-being without facing accusations of being an 'a*shole'?
A Wave of Opinions Just Hit the Thread:
The internet jumped in fast, delivering everything from kind advice to cold truth. It’s a mix of empathy, outrage, and no-nonsense takes.