AITA if I tell my tenants they can't have packages delivered to the house?
In a quiet home where trust once reigned, the delicate balance between landlord and tenant begins to fray.
What started as a simple rental arrangement slowly spirals into a silent battle over space and trust, as an overwhelming flood of deliveries threatens the peace of a shared mailbox and the sanctuary of home.
Beneath the surface of punctual rent and easy coexistence lies a growing tension fueled by unchecked habits and unspoken boundaries.
The landlord’s patience is tested daily, caught between kindness and frustration, as the weight of too many packages becomes a symbol of a deeper, unspoken struggle.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) is clearly frustrated, feeling taken advantage of due to the excessive volume of packages delivered to their shared mailbox area, which is now creating a physical hazard and significant inconvenience, especially given their back injury.
The central conflict lies between the OP's reasonable request for boundary respect and the tenant's persistent, convenient shopping habits that disregard the landlord's living space and physical limitations.
Is the OP justified in feeling their tenant is being inconsiderate and rude given the ongoing, unaddressed delivery issue, or would actions such as raising the rent or banning deliveries be an overreaction to a minor inconvenience?
The debate centers on whether the tenant's behavior const*tutes a lease v***ation or merely poor etiquette within a shared living arrangement.
Users Wasted No Time Telling It Like It Is:
The thread exploded with reactions. Whether agreeing or disagreeing, everyone had something to say — and they said it loud.