AITA if I tell my boyfriend not to refer to and introduce me as his "wife"?
They had faced every storm life threw at them—homelessness, heartbreak, and loss—yet their love endured, anch**ed by their shared dreams and a little boy who symbolized their hope.
Five years together, countless sacrifices, and a promise of forever hung in the air, but the absence of a proposal carved a silent ache in her heart, a yearning for a symbol he struggled to give.
She understood his resistance to the idea of marriage, his belief that love needed no government seal, yet her soul craved that declaration, a moment to hold onto amidst their chaotic journey.
As their anniversary pa*sed without a ring, the unspoken tension between them grew, a fragile line between love’s quiet strength and the pain of unfulfilled promises.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) is deeply conflicted, feeling hurt and invalidated because her partner refused to follow through on a plan to legalize their long-term commitment, only to continue using the t*tle of 'wife.' This situation highlights a significant gap between the OP's need for formal commitment and her boyfriend's desire for a commitment-free partnership, despite their shared history and child.
Given that the boyfriend is happy to call her his wife casually but actively avoided the legal commitment when the time came, is the OP justified in demanding he stop using the t*tle 'wife' now, or is this demand another form of pressuring him toward the marriage he explicitly rejected?
From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:
It didn’t take long before the comment section turned into a battleground of strong opinions and even stronger emotions.