The user, a 41-year-old man (OP), shares a 12-year-old son with his ex-wife (37F), following a divorce five years prior. The ex-wife currently lives in their former three-bedroom home, where she also houses her 10-year-old nephew (her sister's son).
Recently, the ex-wife began a relationship, became pr****nt, and moved her new boyfriend (who has a daughter) into the home.
This arrangement resulted in the OP's son and his cousin sharing a room, which prompted the son to request living with the OP full-time. The OP then initiated legal proceedings to seek full custody, which he had previously considered but not pursued.











Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The Original Poster (OP) is facing a conflict where his desire to secure full custody for his son, driven by the son's unhappiness with the living situation, clashes with the financial distress experienced by his ex-wife following the termination of alimony payments.
The core question is whether the OP was justified in seeking full custody and terminating alimony based on the change in his ex-wife's living situation, or if his actions were unfair given the resulting financial hardship on his ex-partner and her new family unit?
This Topic Lit Up the Comments Section:
The thread exploded with reactions. Whether agreeing or disagreeing, everyone had something to say — and they said it loud.