AITA for getting my daughter a better laptop than my son?
In a household where technology is both a tool and a test, a father’s patience is stretched thin by the repeated carelessness of his son.
Despite multiple chances and replacements, the son’s inability to keep a laptop intact contrasts sharply with the daughter’s careful stewardship, igniting a silent tension beneath the surface of everyday life.
Caught between fairness and practicality, the father’s decision to reward responsibility over recklessness stirs a painful accusation of favoritism.
In this quiet battle of broken devices and broken trust, love is questioned, and the fragile balance of family bonds is put to the ultimate test.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The parent is facing a conflict rooted in perceived favoritism after their son, who has a history of damaging electronics, reacted negatively to receiving a lesser replacement laptop compared to his sister.
The central issue lies in the parent's attempt to enforce financial responsibility based on past actions while the son interprets this as unfair treatment and a sign of unequal affection.
Is the parent justified in linking the quality of the replacement device directly to the son's history of carelessness, or does differentiating the replacement based on fault unfairly prioritize the daughter's needs and exacerbate the son's feeling of being unloved?
The core debate centers on whether repair/replacement decisions should focus solely on need or also incorporate accountability for past negligence.
This Topic Lit Up the Comments Section:
Users didn’t stay quiet — they showed up in full force, mixing support with sharp criticism. From calling out bad behavior to offering real talk, the comments lit up fast.