AITA for not cooking "fancier" meals?

Local_Moment_4782 1729 comments

In the quiet rhythm of their daily life, she stands as the unwavering pillar, the sole architect of nourishment for her small family.

Though her hands grow weary from the endless cycle of simple meals, she carries the weight silently, crafting a predictable routine to ease her mind and sustain those she loves.

Yet, beneath the surface of routine and fatigue, a subtle plea lingers—her husband’s casual desire for variety stirs a complex storm within her.

It’s a reminder of the unseen labor she bears, and the emotional exhaustion woven into every meal she prepares, often unnoticed and unshared.

AITA for not cooking "fancier" meals?
‘AITA for not cooking "fancier" meals?’

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.

When the Crowd Speaks, It Echoes Loudly:

Users didn’t stay quiet — they showed up in full force, mixing support with sharp criticism. From calling out bad behavior to offering real talk, the comments lit up fast.

The Original Poster (OP) feels overburdened by being the sole cook for the household and acted out of frustration by stopping the variety of meals when her husband rejected the increased cost of ingred*ents.

The central conflict lies between the husband's desire for varied, complex meals and his simultaneous refusal to either learn to cook or accept the financial implications of his request.

Since the husband demands varied cooking but refuses to support the necessary planning or learn basic sk**ls, is it fair to expect the OP to provide gourmet meals while simultaneously controlling the budget for ingred*ents, or should the husband take immediate responsibility for learning to cook or managing meal planning?