AITA for prioritizing law school over my girlfriend’s baby fever?
For three years, they built a life together, but now Katie’s longing for a baby has cracked the surface of their world.
Her friends’ milestones weigh heavily on her heart, stirring a desire that clashes with the harsh reality he faces—drowning in law school, exhausted, and barely holding on.
The future they once dreamed of feels distant, overshadowed by the relentless demands of survival and ambition. In their quiet moments, tension simmers as he struggles to bridge the gap between logic and emotion.
She sees distance and doubt; he sees necessity and restraint. Their words collide, exposing fears and unmet needs, each feeling unheard and misunderstood.
The fragile thread of their connection trembles under the weight of choices neither is ready to face, yet both must confront.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) is clearly committed to his demanding law school schedule and financial s**bility, viewing his refusal to start a family now as a logical necessity rather than an emotional rejection of his girlfriend, Katie.
Katie, however, experiences his firm stance as a sign that he is emotionally distant and unwilling to meet her timeline for major life milestones, creating a sharp conflict between his current practical reality and her desire for a shared future.
Is the OP justified in prioritizing his immediate educational and financial prerequisites, even if it causes significant distress to his partner, or does Katie have a valid claim that his refusal to engage with her timeline suggests a deeper, perhaps unspoken, lack of commitment to their long-term partnership?
Internet Users Didn’t Hold Back:
The internet jumped in fast, delivering everything from kind advice to cold truth. It’s a mix of empathy, outrage, and no-nonsense takes.