AITA for telling my husband that I would’ve never agreed to have his child if I knew he would go back on our agreement?
The user, a 30-year-old woman, describes a pre-existing agreement with her husband, Jake (35M), made before the birth of their son, Ethan (2M).
This agreement stipulated that they would share parenting responsibilities equally, with Jake also planning to reduce his work hours to prevent the user from sacrificing her career completely.
However, the user reports that the reality is different; she manages all childcare and household ch**es while working part-time from home, while Jake works late and spends evenings on leisure activities like gaming. When confronted, Jake dismisses her concerns by citing his role as the primary financial provider.
After reaching a breaking point due to exhaustion, the user told Jake she regretted having a child with him if he would not keep his promises, leading to tension and Jake calling her ungrateful, leaving the user questioning if her statement went too far.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The user is currently in a difficult emotional space, feeling overwhelmed and unappreciated due to a perceived betrayal of shared parental and household responsibilities.
Her central conflict lies between her need to express the depth of her frustration over broken commitments and the potentially damaging impact her strong statement had on her husband and their relationship dynamic.
The core question for debate is whether the user was justified in using such an extreme statement to highlight the seriousness of her situation, or if her expression of anger crossed an unacceptable boundary in the relationship. Did the severity of the broken agreement warrant such a powerful, relationship-challenging retort?
The Comments Section Came Alive:
Users didn’t stay quiet — they showed up in full force, mixing support with sharp criticism. From calling out bad behavior to offering real talk, the comments lit up fast.