AITA for not letting my friends use my backyard for their wedding because they do not want me to bring a "plus one?"

Long_Assistant8873 1930 comments

The user bought his grandparents' house last summer, a location significant because it was a childhood hangout spot for him and his friends, including his friend "Dave." The property includes a lake and a gazebo.

The user initially planned to purchase the house with his now ex-girlfriend, Leslie, but discovered she had significant hidden debt during the approval process, leading to their breakup about six months prior to the post.

Leslie is the cousin of Dave's long-term girlfriend, Kim, which is how the user and Leslie met. Dave and Kim are now engaged and asked the user if they could host their wedding ceremony at the gazebo, to which he agreed.

Since the user started dating someone new in December, Leslie has reportedly reacted poorly, repeatedly attempting to reconcile despite the user's clear rejections, leading to the current conflict where Dave and Kim requested the user attend the wedding without a plus-one for Leslie's comfort, a request the user found unreasonable given the venue is his property.

AITA for not letting my friends use my backyard for their wedding because they do not want me to bring a "plus one?"
‘AITA for not letting my friends use my backyard for their wedding because they do not want me to bring a "plus one?"’

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.

From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:

The crowd poured into the comments, bringing a blend of heated opinions, solid advice, and a few reality checks along the way.

The core of the conflict centers on the user's property rights versus the social obligations surrounding his friend's wedding venue.

The user feels his request to bring a date should be respected, as the venue is his private property, viewing the demand to attend solo as an unfair imposition due to his ex-girlfriend's presence.

Conversely, Dave and Kim prioritize avoiding extreme discomfort for Leslie, whose presence at the event is central to their day.

The user is now facing an impa*se: either adhere to the venue restriction or withdraw the use of his property for the wedding.

Is the user justified in demanding he be allowed to bring a date, or should he acquiesce to the couple's request to ensure Leslie's comfort at his friend's wedding held on his land?