The core issue involves a family conflict stemming from political differences following an election.
The original poster (OP) has two adult daughters in college whose political and moral viewpoints sharply contrast with those of the OP's parents and siblings, who are noted Trump supporters. The conflict escalated when the daughters quietly left the family group chat.
Upon confrontation, they announced they would skip major holidays like Thanksgiving and Christmas because they believe their family's political support condones unacceptable behavior, such as r**e, lying, and cheating.
This decision caused an intense reaction within the family, leading the OP to face pressure from parents and siblings to force the daughters to attend.
The OP's dilemma is whether to support their adult daughters' moral stance or yield to family demands, particularly given that the OP financially supports both daughters' education and living expenses.









Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The OP is caught between upholding their adult daughters' deeply held moral boundaries and the traditional expectations of family unity pressed by their parents and siblings.
The conflict centers on whether financial support creates a right to control the adult children's social choices, especially when those choices are rooted in the children's perception of their relatives' character.
The central question for debate remains: Should the OP prioritize their adult children's autonomy and moral alignment by continuing to support them unconditionally, or is there an obligation to enforce attendance at family gatherings to preserve family ties, even if it requires the children to compromise their stated values?
Internet Users Didn’t Hold Back:
Users didn’t stay quiet — they showed up in full force, mixing support with sharp criticism. From calling out bad behavior to offering real talk, the comments lit up fast.
NTA.