AITA for Refusing to Let My Parents Live With Me After They “Loaned” Me Money to Buy My House?
A year ago, a young man proudly stepped into the home he had long dreamed of owning, his heart full of gratitude for the generous gift from his parents—a $20,000 down payment that symbolized their love and support.
The celebration of new beginnings felt complete, a promise of family unity and shared joy in this milestone. But the warmth of that moment has since chilled into confusion and hurt.
When hardship struck his parents, their unexpected demand for repayment shattered the trust they had built, turning what was once a gift into a burden.
Now, he faces the painful reality of a relationship strained by unspoken expectations and the fragile line between love and obligation.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy
Strong Takes and Sharper Words from the Crowd:
What started as a simple post quickly turned into a wildfire of opinions, with users chiming in from all sides.
The original poster (OP) is facing a severe conflict where a financial gift was retroactively redefined as a conditional loan, leading to an immediate and indefinite imposition on his personal living situation.
The OP feels betrayed because his parents are leveraging past generosity to demand control over his private property, conflicting directly with his established boundaries and right to autonomy in his own home.
Is the OP an asshole for refusing to allow his parents to move in indefinitely after they unilaterally redefined the down payment as a repayable loan requiring in-kind housing services, or were the parents justified in expecting lifetime access and influence as compensation for their initial contribution?