AITA for refusing to babysit my sister’s miracle baby after what she did to my dog?

No-Sprinkles7135 2788 comments

The original poster (OP), a 28-year-old woman, has a close relationship with her 32-year-old sister who recently had a long-awaited baby after struggling with infertility.

Initially, the family welcomed the new baby, but the atmosphere changed when the sister began expressing strong boundaries regarding the OP's five-year-old golden retriever, Benny.

The conflict escalated when the sister severely mistreated the dog during a stay at the OP's home, locking him in a laundry room without food or water for two days simply because the dog was 'staring' and allegedly upsetting the baby.

Following this incident, the OP refused to allow the sister to ask for free childcare services, leading the sister and their mother to accuse the OP of being selfish and cruel for not helping with the nephew.

The OP is now questioning if her refusal to babysit is justified based on her sister's prior actions toward her pet.

AITA for refusing to babysit my sister’s miracle baby after what she did to my dog?
‘AITA for refusing to babysit my sister’s miracle baby after what she did to my dog?’

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.

From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:

The thread exploded with reactions. Whether agreeing or disagreeing, everyone had something to say — and they said it loud.

The OP is clearly feeling betrayed and hurt because her sister showed a lack of empathy and respect for som**hing deeply important to her—her dog.

The current dispute over babysitting is less about the childcare itself and more about the sister expecting unconditional support after demonstrating a complete lack of consideration and committing an act of cruelty toward the OP's beloved animal.

The OP feels that her sister is demanding reconciliation and help without first acknowledging the severity of her past behavior.

The core question revolves around whether past mistreatment of a cherished pet negates the expectation of familial support, such as free childcare.

Readers must weigh the sister's need for reliable childcare against the OP's right to maintain boundaries based on demonstrated disrespect and mistreatment of her property and companion.

Is the OP justified in using the babysitting request as leverage to enforce accountability, or should family obligations supersede the unresolved grievance regarding the dog?