AITAH for refusing to change my will after my brother asked for “fairness” for his kids?
The individual, a 36-year-old male (OP), has a very close relationship with his niece (10F) and nephew (8M), the children of his younger sister, Emma (34F).
Due to this strong bond, the OP has decided to leave a significant portion of his savings and property to these two children in his will to help them in the future.
The OP's older brother, Dave (38M), who has three children but is not close to the OP, discovered the terms of the will and became upset.
Dave argued that the estate should be divided equally among all five nieces and nephews, claiming his children needed the money more, leading the OP to question if he is wrong for prioritizing the children he is close to.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy
From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:
Support, sarcasm, and strong words — the replies covered it all. This one definitely got people talking.
The poster is facing conflict because he wishes to follow his personal desire to financially support the specific relatives he is close to, while his brother and parents are pressuring him to distribute the assets more broadly based on perceived fairness or family harmony.
The central question is whether an individual has the right to exclusively designate their assets to specific family members based on the strength of their relationship, or if there is a moral obligation to include other relatives, even those with whom the relationship is distant?