AITA for banning everyone who critiques our parenting from meeting our son?
She carried the weight of anxiety and OCD silently, her mind trapped in a relentless storm as pregnancy tightened its grip.
Every bite, every breath was shadowed by an overwhelming fear of harming the life growing inside her, leaving her isolated in a prison of guilt and despair.
The joyous anticipation of motherhood was eclipsed by a desperate longing for freedom, for her body, for peace. In the quiet aftermath of birth, vulnerability lingered palpably in the room.
Her confession, a raw and fragile plea for understanding, was met with steadfast support, cu***ng through the fear with compassion.
As the lactation consultant’s question hung in the air, it marked a poignant crossroads—where love, pain, and hope intertwined in the fragile dance of new beginnings.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) prioritized his wife's immediate mental health and autonomy following a difficult pregnancy, explicitly defending her right to refuse b***stfeeding against external pressure from both medical staff and family.
This action created a direct conflict with extended family members who feel their involvement and good intentions regarding the new baby are being unfairly restricted.
Given the wife's fragile mental state and the OP's protective stance, is the decision to ban critical family members from visiting the newborn until the mother is more secure a necessary act of safeguarding, or does it const*tute an overreaction that damages important family relationships based on good intentions?
Users Wasted No Time Telling It Like It Is:
When users weighed in, they held nothing back. It’s a raw, honest look at what people really think.