The user, a 21-year-old woman who is seven months pr****nt, describes a conflict that arose with her 32-year-old husband regarding post-birth plans.
She notes that her husband has been generally supportive throughout the pregnancy, attending appointments and helping with household ch**es, which she appreciates.
However, the husband recently proposed the idea of taking a "dad-cation," a short vacation with his friends immediately following the baby's arrival, claiming he needs to unwind.
The user strongly objected, pointing out that she will be physically recovering from childbirth, b***stfeeding, and handling the immediate care.
When she called the idea selfish, the husband became defensive, stating he deserves a break too because of his support during the pregnancy, leaving the user questioning if she is overreacting.












Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) is struggling between acknowledging her husband's past support during her pregnancy and feeling that his request for an immediate post-birth vacation is inappropriate and selfish given her physical recovery and the demands of a newborn.
The central conflict revolves around differing expectations regarding immediate parental responsibility versus personal decompression time.
Is the OP correct in refusing the "dad-cation" outright due to the critical nature of the newborn phase, or is the husband justified in feeling he deserves a break shortly after the birth, even if the timing is difficult?
A Wave of Opinions Just Hit the Thread:
When users weighed in, they held nothing back. Itβs a raw, honest look at what people really think.