The user, a 17-year-old male, lives in a difficult home environment and questions whether his actions within that setting make him the bad guy.
When he was ten, his mother was diagnosed with a brain tumor, and on the same day, he discovered his father was having an affair with his mother's best friend, Hayley. His mother pa*sed away just over five weeks later.
Following the mother's death, his father and Hayley moved in together, attempting to raise the user and his 8-year-old sister.
The siblings strongly rejected this new relationship, leading to significant acting out from the user, including yelling, name-calling, and publicizing the affair.
Years later, the user continues to actively undermine his father and Hayley, leading to a recent severe confrontation that caused Hayley significant distress.

















Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The user is deeply hurt by the events of his childhood and is actively punishing his father and Hayley for their betrayal, especially focusing his resentment on Hayley for v***ating his mother's trust.
While the user feels justified in his anger and refusal to accept them, his actions involve continuous, targeted shaming and h***ssment, even years after the initial offense.
The central question is whether the user's ongoing, deliberate effort to make Hayley miserable and publicly shame her—even at the cost of family s**bility and his own mental peace—is a justified response to past trauma or an unacceptable form of sustained bullying.
Should he continue his campaign of retaliation, or is there a point where he must stop the h***ssment for the sake of everyone involved, including the younger children?
A Wave of Opinions Just Hit the Thread:
When users weighed in, they held nothing back. It’s a raw, honest look at what people really think.