AITAH for telling my SIL that family shouldn't have to call her "doctor" just because she now has a PhD?
The user describes a situation involving their sister-in-law (SIL), Elizabeth, who recently earned a PhD in literature after returning to school later in life. The family, including the user's children and nephews, were proud of her accomplishments.
For 36 years, the entire family has affectionately called her "Beth," and the children used "Aunt Beth" or "Auntie Beth." During a recent family gathering, the children greeted her with hugs and called her "Aunt Beth." Elizabeth immediately corrected them, stating it was rude to call someone with a PhD by their first name or as an 'aunt,' demanding to be called 'Doctor Elizabeth Jones' (using her maiden name).
When the user tried to explain that they only knew her as Beth, she pulled the user and her brothers aside to insist on professional etiquette, leading her and her husband to leave early, claiming the family lacked respect. The user now wonders if they were wrong for not informing everyone of this new requirement.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The original poster (OP) and the family are caught between maintaining long-es**blished, affectionate familial traditions and respecting the sister-in-law's newly a*serted professional ident*ty and boundaries, which she is enforcing strictly post-doctorate.
The core conflict lies in whether familial intimacy permits informal address despite significant professional achievement, or if the SIL's right to define how she is addressed overrides relational history.
The central question is whether the family's failure to immediately adopt the formal address upon learning of her PhD requirement const*tutes a failure of respect, or if the SIL's demand for formal t*tles at a family function is an unreasonable imposition on es**blished relationships.
How should the family navigate this clash between respect for status and respect for relational closeness?
Internet Users Didn’t Hold Back:
When users weighed in, they held nothing back. It’s a raw, honest look at what people really think.