AITA for skipping my brother's wedding because I wasn't invited to the engagement party?
The original poster (OP), a 28-year-old man, shares a long history of closeness with his twin brother, despite moving across the country for college and career opportunities.
The core conflict began when the brother announced his engagement and planned an engagement party, which the OP eagerly offered to attend.
Despite the OP's repeated attempts to confirm the date for the party, he was consistently stonewalled by his brother and family, eventually learning it was a large event from which he was deliberately excluded.
This exclusion became the first in a series of perceived slights regarding the wedding events, leading the OP to skip the wedding entirely.
The central dilemma is whether the OP was justified in his reaction to this sustained pattern of being excluded and made to feel unwelcome.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The OP is grappling with the apparent withdrawal of affection and connection from his immediate family, particularly his twin brother and parents, following the engagement.
His decision to skip the wedding was a direct response to a year-long pattern of being excluded from important family celebrations, feeling that his presence was only desired for appearances rather than genuine inclusion.
The core question for debate is whether the OP's decision to prioritize his own emotional boundaries by not attending the wedding was a justified act of self-respect in response to repeated disrespect, or if it was an overly punitive action that escalated family conflict unnecessarily.
Readers must weigh the impact of the documented exclusions against the significance of missing a major life event.
A Wave of Opinions Just Hit the Thread:
This one sparked a storm. The comments range from brutally honest to surprisingly supportive — and everything in between.