The original poster (OP), a 26-year-old man, is in a six-month relationship with his 23-year-old partner. A conflict has arisen regarding s*xual protection during int*****rse.
The partner insists on using the withdrawal m**hod (pull out) instead of condoms, arguing that abstaining from condoms is 'much s*xier' and provides a 'larger thrill.' The OP is concerned about the high risk of unintended pregnancy and other potential issues a*sociated with the withdrawal m**hod, leading him to doubt his position when she dismisses protection as unnecessary.




Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The central conflict revolves around the OP prioritizing physical safety and responsibility concerning pregnancy risk, while his partner seems focused on maximizing s*xual excitement by rejecting reliable contraception.
The OP is left feeling pressured and questioning the validity of his health and safety concerns against his partner's strong preference for a less secure m**hod.
Does the partner's desire for a 's*xier' experience outweigh the tangible risks of pregnancy a*sociated with the withdrawal m**hod, or is the OP correct to insist on effective protection even if it impacts the perceived mood of the encounter?
When the Crowd Speaks, It Echoes Loudly:
This one sparked a storm. The comments range from brutally honest to surprisingly supportive — and everything in between.