AITA for not telling my roommate about my large salary, when I'm aware he's been struggling to pay rent?
The user, a 28-year-old female, lives with three roommates in a small two-bedroom apartment, a living arrangement they maintained for six years primarily due to shared needs during graduate programs. For the entire duration, all four individuals split the rent, utilities, and groceries evenly.
The user recently finished residency, secured a well-paying job as an emergency physician, and continued paying the same low share of the expenses to build savings for medical school loans.
Conflict arose when roommate A was treated at the user's hospital, revealing her increased income, which led to confrontation by all roommates upon her return, accusing her of 'hoarding money' while roommate A struggled financially.
The user, feeling tired and defensive, ended the discussion abruptly, leading to tension, and now questions whether she is at fault for maintaining the arrangement.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The user finds herself in a difficult position, preferring to keep the comfortable and affordable living situation she has while acknowledging that her significantly increased income creates an unfair financial dynamic, especially considering her roommate A's documented struggles to meet the shared expenses.
The central question is whether the user acted reasonably by upholding the es**blished, equal cost-sharing agreement to meet her financial goals, or if her moral obligation to financially support roommates—especially one struggling—superseded the prior agreement, making her the antagonist in this situation?
A Wave of Opinions Just Hit the Thread:
This one sparked a storm. The comments range from brutally honest to surprisingly supportive — and everything in between.