The user, a 32-year-old woman (OP), has been married to her 36-year-old husband for four years.
The central conflict began when the OP noticed a strange, off-taste in her personal food items, like overnight oats and coffee, despite not becoming physically ill.
After consulting a friend, the OP installed a hidden camera, which shockingly revealed that her husband was urinating into her food and beverages. Following this discovery, the OP reacted explosively, causing significant damage to his property.
The husband is now pleading for reconciliation, claiming it was an attempt to fulfill a long-standing, non-consensual f***sh, leaving the OP questioning whether to stay or leave.








Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The OP is in a state of extreme distress and betrayal following the discovery of her husband's secretive and invasive actions.
The conflict pits the husband's insistence on working through his bizarre, non-consensual f***sh against the OP's justified feelings of v***ation and the destruction of trust in their marriage.
The core issue is whether this profound breach of trust, enacted through a f***shistic act hidden from the OP, const*tutes an unforgivable v***ation warranting divorce, or if the husband's promises of therapy and change are enough grounds for the OP to attempt to salvage the marriage.
Should the OP prioritize her immediate safety and feelings of v***ation, or work through the marriage vows?
A Wave of Opinions Just Hit the Thread:
The community had thoughts — lots of them. From tough love to thoughtful advice, the comment section didn’t disappoint.