P*ed my pants. My bf wouldn’t help me
The original poster (OP) experienced an accident during a university exam where, due to stress incontinence from a previous childbirth, she wet her pants after holding her need to urinate for too long.
After the incident, she was in a difficult situation as she needed to change her soiled clothes immediately.
OP reached out to her boyfriend (BF) for a*sistance, specifically asking him to purchase and bring her a change of clothes from the campus gift shop.
However, the BF initially refused to help unless she sent him money first and then refused to bring the clothes directly to her inside the women's restroom, forcing her to walk out of the stall in wet clothing.
This situation left OP feeling furious and questioning the validity of her anger toward her boyfriend's lack of support.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The core conflict for OP lies between her immediate need for compa*sionate support during an embarra*sing medical issue and her boyfriend's refusal to provide that support, citing impractical or boundary-related excuses.
OP is left feeling unsupported and highly upset by her partner's actions in a moment of vulnerability. The reader must consider whether the boyfriend's actions const*tuted a reasonable boundary or a failure to support a partner in distress.
Was OP justified in her extreme anger over his refusal to help her resolve an urgent, embarra*sing medical situation?
This Topic Lit Up the Comments Section:
The crowd poured into the comments, bringing a blend of heated opinions, solid advice, and a few reality checks along the way.