The OP, a 24-year-old man, shared living quarters with his roommate, Karl, for two years.
A conflict began when Karl, who identified as pans*xual, repeatedly asked the OP if he had ever considered experimenting with other men, despite the OP stating he was uncomfortable with the questions and that their relationship was purely circumstantial roommating.
The situation escalated dramatically when the OP discovered Karl hiding under his bed in the middle of the night.
Following this terrifying discovery, Karl confessed to sleeping under the OP's bed several nights a week for months in an effort to become 'psychically saturated.' The immediate aftermath involved the OP fleeing the apartment in fear, and now he is being pressured by Karl and mutual acquaintances to accept apologies, leaving the OP questioning if his extreme reaction is justified.


















Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The core conflict pits the OP's absolute right to privacy, personal boundaries, and physical safety against the roommate's intense, intrusive behavior rooted in an unusual desire for proximity.
The OP is currently dealing with significant emotional distress, compounded by social pressure suggesting he is overreacting and should forgive the months of non-consensual surveillance.
The central question is whether the OP's fear and subsequent decision to immediately vacate the shared space is a reasonable response to the invasion of privacy and stalking, or if the social pressure to accept his roommate's apology and 'work it out' holds valid weight given the roommate's self-proclaimed sensitivity. Is the OP right to prioritize his safety and peace over appeasing the roommate's feelings?
When the Crowd Speaks, It Echoes Loudly:
When users weighed in, they held nothing back. It’s a raw, honest look at what people really think.