AITA for telling my dad i would not be coming around as often because of his love for Trump?
A 26-year-old woman, the Original Poster (OP), has a long-standing political disagreement with her Republican father.
The conflict recently intensified because the father strongly supports a specific political figure, whom the OP views as morally unfit due to past serious accusations and perceived discriminatory views.
The father expressed happiness about the election outcome and dismissed the OP's deeply held moral objections, referencing her Christian upbringing as justification for his political stance.
Feeling her personal trauma and moral values were disregarded, the OP is now questioning whether creating distance from her father is a justified response to this severe rift.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The OP is experiencing significant distress because her father's political celebration directly clashes with her personal moral boundaries, especially concerning issues related to s*xual a*sault and social inclusion.
Her desire to distance herself stems from feeling invalidated and deeply disappointed by his lack of empathy.
The core debate is whether maintaining a relationship requires accepting viewpoints that one finds morally reprehensible, or if es**blishing strong personal boundaries that include separation is necessary for self-preservation.
Readers must decide if the OP is justified in pulling away due to this fundamental moral incompatibility.
Users Wasted No Time Telling It Like It Is:
This one sparked a storm. The comments range from brutally honest to surprisingly supportive — and everything in between.