AITAH: wife wants me to "set a budget" for s'x as part of her sahm role.
The user, a 33-year-old man (OP), is the sole financial provider for his family of four, a living arrangement agreed upon with his stay-at-home wife.
The conflict began when the wife started demanding that the OP set aside a specific budget or payment for s*xual intimacy, framing it as compensation for her duties as a stay-at-home mother and housekeeper.
The OP reacted with upset and disappointment, refusing this demand, which the wife has now escalated into a firm insistence.
She argues that her nighttime efforts in maintaining intimacy after a long day of domestic work deserve compensation, while the OP feels her request is unreasonable and selfish.
The core question is whether the OP is at fault for refusing to budget for s*x within their marriage.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get the latest stories delivered to your inbox.
The OP is in a difficult position, feeling deeply hurt by his wife's shift in perspective regarding physical intimacy, viewing it now as a transactional service rather than a mutual aspect of their marriage.
This conflict highlights a fundamental disagreement over the nature of marital duties and expectations, specifically whether domestic labor ent*tles one partner to financial compensation for s*xual access.
Readers must consider the validity of viewing marital s*x as a duty warranting separate financial reward versus the OP's stance that intimacy should be an organic part of a partnership where financial support is already es**blished.
Is the wife justified in demanding compensation for her time and effort, or does this request undermine the partnership structure they previously agreed upon?
From Supportive to Savage: The Crowd Responds:
The thread exploded with reactions. Whether agreeing or disagreeing, everyone had something to say — and they said it loud.