AITA for telling my ex I don't care if her daughter is crying about being left behind when my son's with me?
The user, a 27-year-old man, ended a 4.5-year relationship with his partner after discovering she had cheated and that a baby she was carrying might not be his.
Upon the birth of her daughter, a DNA test confirmed that the user's 6-year-old son was indeed his, but the daughter was not biologically related to him.
Despite this, the ex-partner, her parents, and her sister asked the user to raise the daughter as his own so the children could grow up together. The user refused, prioritizing his role as the father to his biological son and establishing 50% custody.
The issue escalated when the ex-partner began pressuring him publicly to bond with the non-biological daughter, leading to confrontations and accusations from her family, leaving the user to question if his firm stance is justified.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy
When the Crowd Speaks, It Echoes Loudly:
What started as a simple post quickly turned into a wildfire of opinions, with users chiming in from all sides.
The user is facing intense emotional pressure from his ex-partner and her family to assume a paternal role for a child who is not biologically his, despite his clear boundary that he will focus solely on his son.
His actions stem from a desire to protect his established family unit and avoid responsibility for a situation created by his ex-partner's infidelity.
The central conflict is whether the user's absolute refusal to engage with or accept responsibility for the ex-partner's daughter, even in the face of emotional appeals regarding the children's sibling bond, is a necessary self-preservation tactic or an unnecessarily harsh response toward an innocent child.
The debate hinges on the limits of his obligation versus the perceived emotional needs of the ex-partner's family.