Now, as her brother and his wife prepare to welcome their first child, her silent hope surfaces once more. She clings to the possibility of naming their daughter, a fragile thread connecting her to the motherhood she yearned for but never had, and the subtle disappointment in her eyes speaks volumes of love, loss, and unspoken dreams.
My older sister (34F) was born without the reproductive organs required to have a biological child. Because of her condition she also has some other health problems which disqualify her from adopting due to the uncertainty around her quality and length of life.
She was aware for most of her life that she couldn’t have biological children. That was discovered when she was still very young but the rest came throughout her 20s. She had dreams of motherhood and had lists of baby names she wanted to use.
But she will never be able to use them on children that are hers. What I (28M) did not know at the time was she had saved her baby names and was hoping she would get to name or help name my future children.
My wife (27F) and I are expecting our first child. We haven’t announced the sex but my sister thinks we’re having a girl and shared her girl names with us. We thanked her and said we (wife and I) would discuss what the name would be at some point.
My sister looked upset by the response and she then shared her boy names thinking she got it wrong. We gave her the same response.
My mom suggested a couple of months ago that it would be generous and kind to let my sister have some input. I told her we felt it was better if we named our child ourselves.
My wife and I did look at the list, just to see if we liked any of the names. We did not. Names on the lists included Elizabeth, Hannah, Rosemary and Francesca for girls and James, Edward, Patrick and Michael for boys.
Those just aren’t to our preference. None of them were and there were more names.
My sister mentioned the names again recently and she said we should pick Elizabeth for a girl and Michael for a boy. She said that’s what she’d do if she were having the baby. I told her we hadn’t made our mind up yet but were still in discussions about it.
She offered to help and I said no thanks, my wife and I want to figure it out between us. My sister said she wants to be a part of naming all our babies. That she would love to share all her endless thoughts on names that she’ll never get to put into her own kid.
I told her I understood she wanted that but my wife and I as parents would name our child and she does not get to be a part of that. I told her I understood that was hurtful to her but she does not get a say.
I also asked her to please stop bringing it up. My sister told me I could let her have at least a little say in this and I said sorry but no.
She cried to mom, who thinks we should be more sensitive, while my dad told my sister I wasn’t wrong and she needs to accept that she doesn’t get to name our baby. My response has caused a divide among my parents and sister and me.
It has been made clear my mom thinks I lack compassion and my sister believes I’m hurtful to her.
Conclusion
The original poster (OP) is facing a difficult situation where their sister, who cannot have children due to medical reasons, strongly desires a significant role in naming the OP’s first baby. The central conflict arises from the OP and his wife’s desire to maintain full autonomy over naming their child, which directly clashes with the sister’s deeply felt, unmet longing for motherhood, leading to emotional distress for the sister and accusations of lacking compassion from the mother.
Is the OP justified in firmly setting a boundary that only he and his wife will name their child, prioritizing parental autonomy over accommodating the sister’s emotional needs regarding her inability to have children, or is the OP being unnecessarily cruel by denying his sister a cherished, meaningful form of involvement in the next generation?
Here’s how people reacted:
If she really wants children – and biological is not working. And adoption in your country isn’t allowed because of her health issues. She might can look into adopting somewhere else or do a privat adoption (don’t know the real therm. But when a pregnant woman wants to give up her child to people she knows before and not just let the child go into the system) or even a surrugate (don’t like that. But it is a job in some countries and if your sister seems healthy enough to have kids – why not. Maybe if she has a partner it would be better, so that the child chould have a second parent, even if something happen to your sister)
Though even with that, she can still be a mom and have fur babies, or maybe even go into foster care since adoption isn’t on the table. She can also volunteer at hospitals or a daycare or find any number of ways to care and nurture without being a bio mom (speaking as another who can’t have babies. It is really hard sometimes, but I’ve found other ways to channel my maternal energy that are healthy and fulfilling.)
Some folks even buy silicone babies, which can seem creepy to others, but gives people unable to have children (or those who are grieving a loss) a physical outlet.
Loads of options out there
Your sister needs to find other outlets. She can use her favourite names on pets, on characters in books, naming her car, naming the plants in her garden, on characters she creates for a role playing game. She can set up an entire village in The Sims and name them all (AND micromanage their lives or they lie on the floor crying).
My point is, she needs to focus on things to entertain herself instead of fixating on your life and your baby.
But that doesn’t mean she gets to take over parts of other people’s experience of having children.
You tried to be diplomatic, but her insistence has forced this conflict. Maybe you could have found gentler, kinder words, but I don’t think any way you could have worded it would have prevented the hurt.
Congratulations on your upcoming baby, and also on setting and keeping personal boundaries!
Of course your sister shouldn’t be involved in your decisions about rearing your child, including its name. It’s very sad about your sister’s condition, but that doesn’t change things. Your mom is being weird though getting involved and trying to guilt you — your dad is right. And you are right for setting a reasonable boundary together with your wife and sticking to it together.
Your sister’s situation is extremely sad, but this still doesn’t give her any say in what you and your wife name your child.
It does sound as though she has built up a fantasy of this baby being shared with her. Understandable but far from healthy. I think you have done a good job shutting down the name. You might need to be prepared for more battles down the line though.
Naming a child is the choice of the parents. And you are wise to set reasonable, hard boundaries before she thinks there are other decisions she can make as your proxy parent.
Your mother also needs shutting right down now.
NTA
That said please don’t give your child a tragedeigh name.
What if you incorporate one of her suggestions as a middle name?
No you are not required to use her input. But it would mean a lot to her considering her situation. Sometimes a compromise solves a lot.
But do what you and your wife are comfortable with. NTA
Firstly, congratulations on your impending arrival.
Its none of your sister or mums business what you and your wife choose to name your children. They should respect your decision and be happy for you. Thankfully your dad seems to have a sensible head on his shoulders.
I understand that your sisters circumstances aren’t the best since she can’t have a kid and can’t adopt, but the kid is yours, so you have a right to name your child
Your sister’s situation is sad, but it doesn’t entitle her to a say in what your, or anyone else’s, children are named.
Just because her feelings are hurt doesn’t mean you did anything wrong. NTA
Updatebot, updateme