But when the secret was revealed, the warmth of camaraderie quickly turned cold with resentment and anger. What was meant to be a simple choice ignited feelings of betrayal and frustration, exposing the fragile balance between individual needs and group solidarity on the road.
I’m traveling with five friends now and we are travelling cheap. However we had one long layover in an airport with a great VIP lounge.
The thing about these lounges is that they have free food and liquor. And comfortable chairs and shower facilities.
I told my friends what I was about and they all said that they didn’t want to waste money.
So I went to the lounge by myself. I had some snacks. A few drinks. A quick nap. A long hot shower. And then I caught up with my friends at the gate.
My phone was fully charged, I was bright eyed and bushy tailed. And a little drunk. When we started talking they were bitching about the cost of everything at the airport.
They send why I looked so pleased with myself. I told them about my stay in the lounge.
Two of them got visibly angry. They said I was an asshole for not telling everything their was in the lounge. They had actually spent more on food and drinks than I had. Plus I got to nap in a comfy chair and have a shower.
I said that lounges aren’t a secret and that the internet exists. They could have looked up the same information I did.
Conclusion
The original poster (OP) prioritized their personal comfort and needs during a long layover by utilizing an available VIP lounge, despite their friends choosing not to partake due to cost concerns. The central conflict arose when the OP’s friends became angry, feeling misled or excluded because they were not explicitly informed about the full benefits of the lounge, especially after they spent more money on airport amenities than the OP did.
Was the OP obligated to actively convince or insist that their friends join them in the lounge when the friends had already expressed an unwillingness to spend money on it, or were the friends responsible for researching the amenities available during their layover? This situation tests the balance between informing travel companions and respecting their independent choices.
Here’s how people reacted:
Sure they could have and should have done the research and are AH for being mad about not going but sometimes if you don’t know what info your looking for it can be hard to find. Also if they have only used smaller airports, they might have thought it was just a special seating area and not known about all the perks. These are also supposed to be your friends you don’t have to rub it in and the should be moody because they made the wrong choice.
You suck because not everyone travels or knows all that information, a good friend would at least inform their travel king companions of the benefits so they could all enjoy together
Your friends suck because you are not responsible for their choices and they could have asked you what all the lounge fee includes.
I’ve traveled with friends before and had the same dilemma of them not wanting to spend the money, but I took the 5 minutes to explain what all was included and then we all enjoyed the lunge together.
with a long layover, lounges are an amazing hack. Especially if you want cocktails – airport cocktails can be like 30 bucks. 2 cocktails and you’ve paid for your lounge pass.
however, maybe don’t gloat about the great time you’ve had when you’re with people who had a rough time. Especially if you’ve got to travel together. Keep the peace.
If you like your friends, knew they were money conscious, and believed this was a better deal, I don’t know why you wouldn’t mention that food/drinks/showers are included in the price.
If the money is shared, then YTA. Plain and simple. You don’t spend shared money without talking to the others about it first.
If the money is yours, then NTA. What makes your friends have the right to think that you spending your own money is something they get to control?
“You can lead a horse to water”..
You’re right, the existence of paid lounges is hardly secret.
Are they 5 years old? No? Then they should be able to make decisions on their own.
NTA
Bet they won’t ever travel with you again. In fact, you’re lucky if they continue talking to Your Smugness.