In the absence of written wishes, the family’s peaceful sharing of the jewelry became a testament to their connection and respect for one another. Even from afar, the granddaughter received a ring, believed to hold only a fake diamond, but truly shining with the thoughtfulness and care of those who wanted her to carry a piece of their grandmother’s heart every day.

My grandmother passed earlier this year and she had a pretty nice jewelry collection. Before she passed she knew what went to who and had had me meet to see what I’d like. Instead of jewelry I asked for her wedding dress.
No one else wanted it, I had gotten married in it, and she was really touched. After talking to her kids she went ahead and gave it to me before passing.
When she did pass away I was surprised she hadn’t written down who got what pieces. Since I had already passed on inheritance of a piece I didn’t go to the meeting with the rest of the family.
Basically they sat down and went oldest to youngest and let each person pick until there were no pieces. From what I heard it was peaceful and everyone was happy.
Since I wasn’t there they still wanted me to have something and picked a ring they thought had fake diamonds. It was the biggest and they assumed it was a diamond substitute. It was sweet of them to do that, so I could have a piece of her everyday too.
When I got the ring I didn’t examine it. It was big enough I thought it was fake too. But then I saw a diamond on the inside band (indicating Leo diamonds). I took it to get it evaluated and it has real diamonds.
It’s value is about 5k more than her next expensive piece (they had the papers on all of those). Essentially I got a nicer and more expensive piece than even her oldest daughter. But they chose it for me.
Now, they want to redo the distribution. But I feel like it’s fair. I didn’t ask for anything, they gave me something anyways, now they realize the value of it and want it back. AITA if I refuse?
Edit to add INFO: I didn’t tell anyone. The jeweler mentioned it to my Aunt and it got around to the rest of the family.
Conclusion
The original poster (OP) is facing a conflict because the family wants to redistribute inherited jewelry after discovering that the ring they gifted the OP has significant monetary value. The OP feels resistant to this redistribution because they initially deferred from the main selection process as requested, and the family voluntarily chose the item for them, making them feel the arrangement is now fair.
If the family insists on reopening the distribution based on the ring’s actual value, should the OP uphold their initial position based on the spirit of the gift and their non-participation in the main selection, or should they agree to a recount to ensure equitable value distribution among all inheritors?
Here’s how people reacted:
To be clear, you arn’t obligated to give back the ring as it is yours now, but sometimes being the better person means doing something even if you don’t have to do it.
You choose to not inherite any jewellry in favor of the wedding dress (which was a really thouching thing to do btw). The rest of the family choose to divide up the jewellry by a simple system, and then they decided to gift you a piece of jewellry for to have as a keep sake. That to me comes across as this ring not being your inheritance, but a gift from you family, a gift given with love. They gave you what they thought was a cheap piece of jewllery, but that doesn’t take away from the gesture, as it wasn’t only meant to be a momento.
It is tacky to ask for a gift back, and it certainly comes across as greedy. If you had choosen to inherite jewellry and had participated in the system to divy up the jewellry fairly and had later realised you had ended up with the most expensive piece, then your family would defenitly be TA for even asking to re-do the choosing of jewellry. What makes this differently is that this was meant to be a nice gesture from your family, and after realising that they accidentilly gave you the most expensive jewellry it takes away the good feelings and intentions with which they gave it to you. They wouldn’t have given you that ring if they knew what it was worth, not because they don’t value you or believe you are entitled to an inheritance from your grandmother, but because they believe that as you had already gotten your choosen inheritance so that a jewellry with only a sentimental value was more suitable.
In an ideal world they would have been able to shrug of the mistake and everyone would still be happy with the jewellry they got regardless of what someone else got, maybe even be happy for your good fortune. But this isn’t an ideal world and your family is upset that they accidentilly gave away valueble jewellry instead of the sentimental momento they intended, so this is the situation you now have to deal with.
The main reason I believe you would be better of returning the ring and letting them re-do dividing up the jewellry is because otherwise what started up as a nice gesture from your family to you ends up causing a rift in your family. Inheritance can bring out the worst in people and ruing family relationships, but until now your family had managed to handle it fairly and even with kindness. This ring is the one issue. You would be such a good person for giving back something that is legally yours and accepting a less valuable jewellry instead to help your family maintain good relationships and feelings towards each other.
As I wrote about, you’re not obligated to do it at all. No one is obligated to be kind to others, especially of it costs them.
But considering that this ring was given to you with such kind intentions, it seems almost tragic to let it turn into something about which people are resentful. Especially when it’s seems solvable. It’s not like you care about the value of the ring, so accepting another piece of jewellry to have as a momento of your grandmother seems like a bareble sacrifise.
However, money and inheritance does weird things to people. My grandfather owned a farm in Poland that he didn’t sell or give away but instead leased it for the equivalent of property taxes. After 50 years his 3 kids had all moved to American and had lives here and kind of wrote off the farm. My mom, in her 70s, got kind of nostalgic of where she was a kid and on one of her trips back to Poland, started the legal paperwork to establish ownership (grandfather had died at this point). After countless hours of effort, thousands of dollars in lawyers fees and and an actual court proceedings she established ownership of the farm.
Then when she got back home the 2 siblings who didn’t want anything to do with reclaiming the farm and had written it off were clamoring for their “share”.
However, if you feel like it’s fair and you’re okay with it, give it back.
If you want to keep it, put it in a safe deposit box at a bank. Small ones are cheap enough. Some banks have a special where if you open up a checking account, the first year is free. I would call around.
The choice is up to you. If you chose the latter, I wouldn’t be surprised if it “goes missing” in the coming weeks until it’s secured.
Take care and good luck
Your late grandma didn’t give that to you, so you have no big sentimental feeling about it. And you said you didn’t want jewelry anyway.