Amid the chaos of accusations and pain, a man stands firm in his commitment to his child, challenging the shadows of a troubled past. This is not just a battle over jobs or assistance—it’s a fight for respect, identity, and the kind of fatherhood that transcends mistakes and resentment.

My wife (26f) and I (30m) recently had our first child and we traveled cross states to visit family this weekend. While at my father in law (53m) home, he asked me if I was looking into any new jobs as I am a gig driver full time.
I told him I prefer this line of work as I have as much free time as I need while making ends meet.
While discussing this, I bring up that with our son, we qualify for snap/wic. He loses it. He calls me lazy and a disappointment for not wanting more in life. We go back and forth on the need for snap and such and he just doesn’t let it go.
In the heat of the moment, I snap and tell him that he doesn’t have a say in my life because of how he raised his daughter. He left at 3 months because her mom supposedly cheated. The test came back and he is her father, so now 20 years later he’s attempting to make up for it.
I tell him I am a better father than he ever was. Also, she is worse off with him in her life. I have a temper.
We argue. We eventually just both go off to bed. I am sitting here dumbfounded as he is also a contract worker as well. He just doesn’t believe you should live off the government, again, we only qualify because of our son.
Am I the asshole?
Conclusion
The original poster (OP) is facing a significant conflict rooted in differing views on financial independence, work ethic, and the use of government assistance programs, particularly now that they have a child. The situation escalated sharply when the father-in-law (FIL) attacked the OP’s employment choice and eligibility for benefits, leading the OP to retaliate by bringing up painful, unresolved issues regarding the FIL’s past abandonment of his daughter (the OP’s wife).
Given the intense emotional trigger related to parenting history and the financial debate, was the OP justified in using their wife’s father’s past failures as a weapon against him to defend their current lifestyle choice, or did this retaliation cross an unforgivable line in the family dynamic?
Here’s how people reacted:
There is something you be said for both….I think your FIL wants you to be able to provide for your family, without government assistance, and to have a buffer in case work runs out. As a contract worker, he might have experience with this and depending on government assistance can be risky. You are coming from a position where you feel you are able to provide and that should be enough, and you enjoy the free time you have, which prob also makes you less stressed.
I think there should be way for the two of you to talk about this without fighting. I’m sure you both just want the best for your families. He has no right to tell you what to do, and his communication skills are prob lacking, so set you boundaries, but there are better ways to handle this than arguing.
on the one hand, needing SNAP/WIC isn’t “making ends meet”. It’s very specifically a failure to make ends meet, so the govt has stepped in to help with that. I’ve been on SNAP, I am on Medicaid, and I believe WIC is one of the best programs in the country. So no judgement on needing them, but by definition needing them isn’t making ends meet.
And many parents would be concerned by their kid’s family needing welfare. I can’t imagine my Mil being stoked if I said I love driving Uber bc it’s all the money I need, while living pay check to pay check and using food stamps.
However, your father in law really did lose his right to lecture on these topics. And he doesn’t sound like a good guy. I think what you said is fine
You don’t own these basement sitters here anything, and functioning countries have such policies in place because the **really desperately need ** those kids. So NTA enjoy your family, instead of grinding and not being there. Plenty of time for that later.
Your FIL is an asshole for other reasons but in their scenario I am inclined to agree with him.
Didn’t you say you were a better father than he ever was? Does a better father waste his time on reddit over squabbles he’s already won? Asshole.
But yeah, being content to barely make ends meet because you can rely on snap and WIC is not a long term strategy.
Becoming a real estate agent or salesman who works their ass off for a few years to establish a reputation and coast while making enough to support your family may allow some flexibility.
You’re NTA.
That being said, it’s important to make sure you’re on the same page as your wife regarding throwing her family history in her dad’s face. Your points are valid, but just ensure that you’re not inadvertently causing her hurt because I’m sure that’s not what you would want.
He’s a hypocrite if he didn’t even raise his daughter to want to have a say in how you live your life.
You, because being a gig driver isn’t a career, it’s not a way to set your new family up for success and you should want more than that + government assistance. If it takes the government to make sure your child can eat, that’s not something to be proud of.
Him for his hypocrisy, and you because you can’t see that he is right even though he is a hypocrite.
You should be trying as hard as you can to do better for your son.