When the son and father try to minimize the cost by comparing it to child support payments, the mother stands firm, revealing the harsh reality behind every expense she covers. This isn’t just about a game console—it’s about respect, responsibility, and the unseen burdens she bears every day.

My son (17) asked me for a new gaming system and I said no because he already has plenty of gaming systems and games and doesn’t need more. If he wants one he can save up and buy one.
He then comes to me with a budget on how we can “afford” the system. It was mostly just that if I buy nothing for myself for 2 months, we’ll have enough for the system. I told him hell no, it’s offensive and if he wants the system he has to save up for it.
Then he comes back with another budget. He and his father calculated how much I’ve been paid in child support over the years and they decided it would be a good idea to let me know how little a drop in the bucket the gaming system would be.
I told him I spend that on his expenses every month but he didn’t believe me, so I told him that if he doesn’t think so, he can pay me for his expenses every month and I’ll give him the child support.
Surprise surprise, when I gave him the bill, it showed that when you factor in all of the things I pay for in a month, it’s much more than child support. Child support doesn’t even cover 30%.
Now my ex is yelling at me for making our son feel like an expensive burden, but I think I was teaching him a lesson about money and unteaching him some of what my ex says about support.
ETA: not able to comment, but just wanted to say this isn’t a question of being able to afford the console. I can afford it, but that doesn’t mean he should just get it.
Conclusion
The original poster (OP) maintained a firm stance against buying an unnecessary, expensive item for their 17-year-old son, rooted in a belief that the son should learn financial responsibility through saving. The central conflict arose when the son, supported by his father, attempted to leverage past child support payments to pressure the OP into making the purchase, leading the OP to counter by presenting a detailed accounting of current family expenses.
Was the OP justified in presenting a detailed expense bill to their son as a response to the request to use perceived past support funds, or did this action inadvertently damage the parent-child relationship by making the son feel like an undue financial burden? Should the focus remain solely on teaching delayed gratification, or does calculating and presenting these costs undermine the established parental support structure?
Here’s how people reacted:
Your son very obviously handled it awfully. It’s ridiculous that he had the audacity to give you a budget.
His dad handled things poorly as well. I agree with the folks who say that if he feels so strongly about the computer, he should shut up and buy it.
However, I don’t feel you handled this perfectly either. 1. Child support from his dad isn’t supposed to cover all of his costs, because you are supposed to support the kid too. Not just the dad. So if you didn’t include your payment to the kid as well, you weren’t setting a realistic budget for him to learn from.
2. I would have advised using it as a teaching moment by showing him how a real budget works, listing all of the household incomes and costs. That teaches him about real bills and numbers, while showing him that you are a family, and that he’s not just a bill.
Hahaha, this reminds me of some of the things my dad would say… When I was in my third year of uni, he was furious when I told him I was running low on money and planned to get a part-time job to make up the difference. He said something about how he gave my mum all this money for a college fund and she must have spent it on herself. I asked my mum about it… it was only $11k (enough to pay for like… one semester of tuition and living expenses?), and my older sister had used most of it. He just had no idea how much our expenses were. He also never paid any child support, so I would not have blamed my mum for one second if she HAD used that money. Some dads, man…
However, you seem to not understand “gaming systems” if you think he has plenty and doesn’t need more. Sure, he doesn’t “need” more as its a luxury item along with 99% of the stuff we buy. But, he’s not making up the fact that his old system is no longer needed. Games aren’t something that last forever. It’s like buying the Blu-Ray of a movie, you can only watch it so many times before you’re bored with it. If someone told you that you don’t need to see the latest Marvel film or whatever but you can go home and watch Home Alone 2, again. They’d technically be right, but are you really going to be okay with Home Alone 2 as the only film you can watch?
And you’re right. You did teach him a lesson about finances and how expensive it is to raise a child.
EDIT: also, not that this isn’t obvious, but a gaming system isn’t a necessity. It’s important you also explain to him the difference between a want and a need. Bills, food, clothing, toiletries all need to come before luxuries.
Go to your kid & tell him that you knew he was going to be expensive when you had him & that you love him more than money & always will.
PS – your ex is a douche who doesn’t like his kid knowing how much MORE you’ve done for your son financially
That being said, I would sit down and explain that he isn’t a burden but new gaming systems are a luxury item. You can maybe help him come up with a strategy to save his own money or suggest he take on work outside the home. He is going to be an adult soon.
You should have shut your son down right away. His father is an absolute fool. However, I would not reveal your household finances to a child. He does not need to see numbers to understand that child support is not for extra video game consoles.
Does your son have a job???
Reassure your son of how much you love him and have never regretted the expense, and point out to his dad that if he feels so strongly that your son deserves the console maybe he could use some of the money he’s saved by not being main carer to buy it.