Yet, in the warmth of a family gathering meant to celebrate togetherness, judgment casts a shadow over their unique bond. The innocent act of signing at the dinner table—an expression of connection and care—was met with misunderstanding, threatening to silence the very language that brings this family closer.

I (29F) have a daughter (6F) from a previous relationship, her father has no contact with her and my husband of 2 years (30M) is the closed to a father she has ever known.
My daughter was born deaf and communicates via BSL. I am fluent having learned alongside her and my husband while not fluent is getting there as he wants to be able to communicate with her fully and also help teach any children we have together to communicate with their older sister.
We went to his parents for an Easter Dinner, his siblings and nieces/nephews were all there and we of course brought my daughter. All the kids were very happy to get plenty of chocolate and play together, the issue rose however during dinner as my daughter kept putting her fork and knife down to sign with me and my husband to talk, it was causing her to eat slower than everyone else and my MIL asked me to tell her to not sign at the dinner table as the food was going to get cold plus it was setting a bad example and distracting for the other kids.
I got angry, I told my MIL that this is how my daughter communicates and i’m not going to make her not sign. I did encourage my daughter to continue eating before her dinner got cold but to not sign?
No…that pisses me off and makes me think of people who have tried to make my daughter play the “Quiet hands” game….aka not sign. I told my MIL the only way she could ask that of my daughter is if she told everyone else not to talk at all.
We ended up leaving a little early and my husband while supportive of me has tried to tell me that his Mother didn’t mean any real harm and she doesn’t get why this would be a sensitive topic.
I’ve refused to speak to my MIL since that dinner and won’t until she apologises, my husband thinks i’m being a bit too harsh and I need to be the one to reach out with an olive branch on this matter but I can’t help but feel if this had been her biological grandchild who was deaf she wouldn’t have said something so insensitive or implied it was a distraction and bad example.
Conclusion
The original poster (OP) reacted strongly when her daughter’s method of communication (British Sign Language, BSL) was criticized at a family dinner by her mother-in-law (MIL). The central conflict lies between the OP’s need to fiercely protect her daughter’s right to communicate naturally and the MIL’s expectation of traditional table manners, which ignored the daughter’s unique needs.
Should the OP maintain a firm stance, refusing contact until an explicit apology is made regarding the insensitivity shown toward her daughter’s communication needs, or should she prioritize repairing the relationship with her husband’s family by extending an olive branch first, acknowledging the MIL’s lack of understanding?
Here’s how people reacted:
There is really no amount of reflection or analysis needed to understand why this request was harmful and discriminatory. A child could probably easily understand that not allowing a deaf person to sign means you are not allowing them to talk. There’s no way that your MIL “didn’t mean any harm.” It’s clear she doesn’t care about the effect on your daughter, and whether she is able to engage like everyone else, only that MIL has control over the dinner table.
Good for you, you sound like a great mom.
Is this a common theme with your MIL, though? Not necessarily that specific request, but just not bothering to accommodate or engage your daughter?
Also: this is her step grandchild now. Is she learning the basics of BSL? Or will she just wait for other kids to be born so she can be a grandma whilst ignoring her step grandchild?
I would ask for a meeting between adults, express your feelings and discuss how grandma will learn about ableism and learn about your daughter’s needs.
You are a great mum and keep backing up your girl.
I do think not talking to her is a bit much whilst having a conversation might help.
But do you actually think that if we were talking about a biological grandchild, she would not have had that behaviour ? I don’t.
Honestly, it sounds like your husband’s family has made no effort to learn sign language. Why should your daughter spend time with them if they make no effort to include her ? Stand your ground on this.
If your MIL behaves this badly on “her turf”, I’d only host dinners at my house, or not eat with her at all.
It wasn’t your bad behavior that caused this. She should be the one to extend the olive branch.
If the other children are allowed to talk at the table, but MIL expects your daughter to sit without communicating, your MIL is a massive asshole.