Taking a vacation is a luxury that not everyone can afford, so it is essential to make the most of these precious moments. This narrative centers on the OP, who meticulously planned a romantic retreat for herself, her husband, her sister-in-law (SIL), and her spouse. OP had no idea that her dream vacation would quickly turn into a disaster.
When booking an Airbnb, OP was aware that it was not a pet-friendly establishment. However, her sister-in-law was adamant that her dog, Brute, should be permitted everywhere. The OP made her sister-in-law aware of this restriction, and her sister-in-law assured her that it would not be a problem because she planned to find a trustworthy dog-sitter for Brute during their Florida trip.
The chosen Airbnb was in a picturesque beachfront area of Tampa, which was a 15-hour drive from their home. While the OP and her husband chose to fly, SIL insisted on driving, oblivious to the chaos that awaited them.
When we arrived at the rental property, my sister-in-law and her husband were already in the driveway. In an effort to conceal Brute, SIL urgently requested the keys from OP. “Are you kidding me right now?” the OP could only utter incredulously, completely dumbfounded.
The only condition had been flagrantly violated by SIL, who justified her actions by claiming she could not find a dogsitter. As an elderly, well-behaved dog, Brute rendered the “ignorant” no pets rule obsolete, in her opinion.
The husband of the OP was astounded by his sister’s audacity as he sat in disbelief. Unfortunately, OP’s vacation was quickly marred.
Exasperated, the OP retreated to the rental car, opting to ignore her SIL’s complete lack of consideration. Requesting a refund from Airbnb, OP met with the host and candidly described the unfortunate occurrence.
The property owner, understanding the situation, offered to allow OP and her husband to stay. However, OP declined the offer and booked a hotel for the remainder of their vacation, determined to salvage what remained of their time away.
Unfortunately, the peace was short-lived, as SIL called incessantly to lament their lack of funds and snacks. OP, feeling the weight of her ruined vacation, chose to disregard the pleas, realizing that her SIL’s actions had cost her $4000 for the Airbnb alone.
To add insult to injury, OP’s mother-in-law reprimanded her for abandoning SIL and her husband. She suggested that instead of abandoning them, OP should have provided them with food money.
Ultimately, OP was forced to deal with the disappointment of her ruined plans and the disagreements within her family, all while attempting to salvage the remainders of a vacation that quickly descended into chaos.
The OP stated, “They can simply return home and obtain food there.” Original post by OP is available below:
Who goes on vacation without any money, not even for snacks?
They knew OP was wealthy and attempted to garner sympathy points.
Considering that my sister-in-law lied about bringing her dog, it is not out of the question that she also lied about having no money.
SIL displayed an absurd level of entitlement, even by the standards of this sub.
If OP’s mother-in-law is so concerned about her daughter, rather than guilting OP, she should Venmo them some money.
There are locations where pets should not be permitted, and it is impolite to bring them just to make a point.
She was relying heavily on OP to go along with her schemes.
This is the true reason she did not fly to Tampa.
There are rules for a reason. Even if the Airbnb owner did not have allergies, it is their property to do as they please.
If she truly desired to bring the dog, she should have reserved a separate room that allowed pets.
SIL almost certainly did not consider this.
This incident cost the Airbnb host a substantial amount of money.
OP described how the refund procedure occurred.
While OP was not a jerk for abandoning her entitled sister-in-law, her abrupt cancellation of a reservation cost the host a substantial amount of money.
In the realm of vacation planning, the simplest requests are sometimes the most difficult to fulfill. Example: the SIL of the OP and her role in a disastrous vacation experience. Even though SIL’s sole obligation was to refrain from bringing her dog, it appeared that even this modest request was too much for her. Not only were the consequences of her actions burdensome, but OP was also unfairly held accountable.
Prior to the trip, OP was responsible for all the meticulous arrangements. She was responsible for all aspects of the trip, including securing lodging and organizing activities, as well as covering all expenses. Despite her efforts, OP was accused of being an a**hole, a truly disheartening turn of events that left her questioning the fairness of the situation.
Noting that OP’s request was not unreasonable is essential. The only requirement placed on the SIL was that she leave her dog behind. By following this simple rule, SIL would have avoided potential conflicts and contributed to a more enjoyable vacation. However, she chose to disregard this request, resulting in a cascade of negative consequences that marred the entire journey.
As OP struggled with the repercussions of SIL’s actions, she could not help but feel the sting of being unjustly labeled the antagonist in this tragic saga. Despite her selflessness and willingness to assume all responsibilities, OP was cast in a negative light and appeared to be punished for doing the right thing.
Faced with such an unjustified accusation, OP was left to contemplate the irony of her situation. It appears that no good deed goes unpunished.
SC: Pupperish and Reddit