The mother learned about this trip only after asking her son about the dress selection process. Feeling excluded from what she considered a significant bridal activity, especially given her financial contribution to the wedding, the mother is questioning her feelings of being intentionally left out. The central dilemma for the mother is whether her expectation to be included in the dress shopping was reasonable or if the fiancée had the right to limit the shopping group.

My husband and I are paying for my son and his fiancé’s wedding (the entire cost). I offered to also pay for her wedding dress and she is insisting to my son that she wants to choose her own wedding dress and pay for it herself.
I’ve now found out she’s booked a holiday abroad to look for wedding dresses with her best friend, mum and her aunt (mum’s sister). I only found this out after I asked my son if she’s picked her wedding dress yet.
It feels like she’s left me out on purpose.
Conclusion
The mother is currently positioned between feeling grateful for being able to pay for the wedding and feeling hurt and excluded from a key celebratory event by her future daughter-in-law. This conflict highlights a clash between her significant financial investment and her desire for inclusion in the emotional milestones leading up to the wedding.
The debate centers on whether financial contribution creates an entitlement to participation in specific wedding planning activities, or if the fiancée is justified in setting clear boundaries around personal choices like dress selection, regardless of who is paying. Should the mother voice her disappointment, or accept the fiancée’s defined shopping party?
Here’s how people reacted:
You paying for the wedding doesn’t make you entitled to something she wants to keep special and exclusive with her own family. It’s like asking if you can be in the birthing suite with her exposed vagina because you paid for the nursery renovation – she politely declined your offer to pay for the dress because she didn’t want to feel obligated to have you there and she’s allowed her own autonomy in making her dress picking entirely her own family.
She’s likely already being very gracious involving you in decisions about the rest of the wedding, probably even accepting your opinion on some of them, because accepting money for a wedding is an absolute minefield – you could twist the control screws any time and say “well I’m paying for it so I want this guest there/this menu option/this musician” and she loses control over her special day. You’re already hinting at that level of control by saying “despite me footing her entire wedding” when in fact you offering your SON financial support for his wedding doesn’t mean you get to walk all over the bride’s wishes to have some special family moments.
Give the money, but there are no strings attached. Honor what your son and his fiancee want. If you are respectful and supportive, your bond with your dil will come.
The dress shopping probably isn’t personal. I never involved my MIL. I never even thought about it. I went shopping with my mother and sister and then eventually sent a text to my in-laws, saying “I found my dress! Can’t wait for you all to see!”
Just the fact that you’ve mentioned paying several times feels a little icky to me. Please take a giant step back and look at yourself here. Perhaps put yourself in your DIL’s shoes and imagine this was your future MIL. Would you invite her on a trip to go dress shopping?
How much of your ‘input’ into the wedding planning have you wanted her to comply with because you are paying for the wedding?
How respectful have you been of the fact that She is getting married and She has a vision for her wedding other than reminding her constantly that ‘You and your husband are paying for the wedding’?
In your 4 paragraph post you have spoken about ‘We are footing the whole bill… We are paying for the entire wedding.. I wanted to pay for the wedding dress’
Do you see the pattern here and why she is literally flying to another country, using her own money and taking her own family and friends to shop for the dress of her dreams?
I know you are paying but I think you need to reflect on whether that money is a gift or a transaction with conditions attatched.
If it is the former, then you can try to talk to her and express that you are excited for them and would love to be part of the journey there with her.
If it is the latter, then you should have stated the conditions beforehand and they would likely have turned the offer down.
Your feelings are valid but have you at any point communicated that you would be honored to help her find her dress? Or just that you would pay and assumed it would buy you a seat?
Also, talk to her directly, don’t make your son be go between on a sore subject where he has to pick sides
But she is paying for the dress and traditionally only the Bride’s family participates in picking the dress so the groom and his family are surprised the day of the wedding.
You need to respect the emotions attached to picking a wedding dress and not impose your emotions and opinions. Given her Mom is not attending which you don’t say why, I suspect there is even more reason why this is an emotional sensitive thing for the Bride.
Paying for the Wedding doesn’t give you a right to take over! Be very careful as your reaction can seriously damage your relationship longterm with your son and his wife. YTA
She loves your son, not you.
As a mother in law, what you can expect is to be tolerated. That’s about it.
If you let her have her space, may be she can even become friendly … but expecting anything more than minimal tolerance, is asking too much already.
What for do you think she said that she wants to pay for her wedding dress and pick it herself?
Exactly so that nobody goes telling her shit about her wedding’s dress.
Leave her alone … for the sake of your son’s happiness. 😉
PS: she might chose the ugliest wedding dress in the history of the universe …
you will compliment her for her choice, no matter what, get it?
Info: Does this mean if you pay for the dress, you get to choose it or have a larger say?
Tbh, why would you even need to be there? Its not as if youll get to choose the dress or its somehow particularly important that you see it in advance, its not going to change anything, youll see it at the wedding like everyone else. Youre not her mother.
To me it sounds more as if youre bothered by not being able to have your say in choosing the dress than about being excluded as such (just being there).
You can always ask your son to go suit shopping with him.
I think you feel like paying for this wedding gives you 100% access to the bride and her experiences (and probably all of the wedding decisions). While paying for the wedding is a nice thing to do (albeit dumb for your son and his bride to agree to for now obvious reasons), it does not mean you should be included in everything.
YTA.
I also get the impression that maybe you wouldn’t join quietly, have strong opinions, and would probably keep reminding them all how much you’re paying for. These are my assumptions from just your post so can’t say for sure.
Plus getting dressed and undressed for shopping is quite intimate and an experience she maybe wants to share only with the people she grew up with.
But, she may feel that if you pay for the dress, you’d feel like you’d have the right to have an opinion, so she’d rather pay for it herself and have the dress she wants.
And in the end, it’s HER wedding and her experience and she holds no obligation to involve you in what is the most intimate choice about a wedding. You’re not her mother. You’re not her mother. You’re going to be her mother-in-law and you two are probably not that close. So, yes YTA for making this about you.
You’re not paying to make the bride do what you want. You’re not paying them so they’ll be attached at the hip to you. It doesn’t make them “owe” you. You’d do it for your son, correct?
Look at your behaviour up to this point and try to evaluate whether or not you’ve been overbearing. She’s paying for her own dress. She’s shopping for it. She doesn’t have to include you. There is probably a reason why. Talk to your son.
I understand you’re disappointed by her decision to not include you but she is allowed to have her own vision of the path she wants to take to get to her wedding day. You can either support her on her journey or make it all about you & be a road block. I’m guessing that’s the reason you were not included.
YTA
Try to ignore everyone here telling you that you shouldn’t feel left out. Your feelings are valid.
Redditors hate all mothers-in-law and don’t view them as human beings with feelings of their own. They’re just seen as an annoyance/irrelevance at best.
But yta as I’m betting this comes from boundary stomping and being over bearing. Add in the fact she doesn’t want you to pay or help pay means you have most likely used money to get your way before.
You already told us that you feel entitled to be included in the wedding dress shopping because you are paying for the wedding. How many other things have you felt entitled to have an opinion on in the wedding because”you’re paying.”
Sounds very much like you’re paying for everything so you can control everything.
The bride’s dress is her ONE THING (in this scenario, I’ll bet) she gets to choose herself. Can you not let her have this ONE THING?
You’re not HER mum. Go tag along with your son to buy his suit.
However, if you’re training to be a MIL from hell, you’re doing great, sweetie.