The OP initially dismissed the demand but faced increasing pressure, including a failed attempt by the ex-wife to enforce these restrictions legally through a custody modification. Since that legal loss, the ex-wife has refused to exercise her custody time, stating her children are not welcome in her home if they have consumed the restricted foods at the OP’s house. The OP is now left with sole custody and is questioning whether his refusal to comply with the new stepfather’s demands is justified, given the strain it puts on his relationship with his ex-wife and his sons’ relationship with their mother.

My ex-wife and I (both in our 30s) divorced 7 years ago. We two boys together aged 8 and 9. My ex-wife remarried two years ago and her husband brought his daughter and son into the marriage.
About five months after they got married my ex’s husband sent me a list of foods I could not feed my kids because his daughter is allergic and whenever my boys are at their house his daughter struggles with her allergies.
He said he heard it from my kids’ mouths that they eat those things when they’re with me. He said anyone coming into their home needs to avoid those foods. And that I must cut them from my kids diet when they’re at my house, which was every other week at this time.
These include, Peanut Butter, Eggs, Cheese, Strawberries, Chocolate.
At first I thought it was a joke but I got an email from this man the next time my kids went to their mom’s house, berating me for not complying with his orders. Then my ex-wife tried to sue me for custody or for it to be placed in the court ordered custody agreement that our boys could not eat those things.
She lost the case on both counts. The judge told them they could not decide on what I feed my kids.
So for the past year my ex has not taken her parenting time with our kids. Her husband is not okay with them being there if they’ve eaten those things at my house. He said his daughter could die and even if it’s not that bad, she should not be made uncomfortable because ‘a grown man child with a petty grudge would not comply with keeping a child safe out of spite for the new father in his kids’ lives’.
My ex blames me for her not being a mom to our kids. She told me all I needed to do was follow the list. That everyone has to. And that she’s already had some family members refuse.
Our boys miss their mom but not their mom’s house. I have tried to plan for them to see each other but she won’t lead or drive here. She doesn’t want to see them if they’re not in her house for her custody time.
They’re not welcome while they eat those foods. And I’m not depriving them of that stuff because this man orders me to.
I have my boys in custody because of this madness. My ex didn’t handle that too well and she told me I’m being a dick and alienating the kids from her. She told me to follow the rules and let the boys have both of us.
I just want to see what others outside of the equation will think. I have support from others. But these are people who know me. AITA?
Conclusion
The OP is in a difficult position, balancing his responsibility to protect his children from potentially unreasonable demands by his ex-wife’s new family against the emotional toll of having his sons miss their mother. His adherence to what he perceives as his parental autonomy conflicts directly with the boundary setting attempted by the stepparent, which his ex-wife fully supports, leading to a near-total cessation of contact between the mother and children.
The central debate revolves around parental rights versus the safety/comfort needs of a stepchild within a blended family structure. Should the OP alter his household routines to accommodate the new family’s needs to maintain contact with the ex-wife, or is he correct in resisting mandates from the stepfather that were not court-ordered regarding his own custody time?
Here’s how people reacted:
Next step is to request a meet with this man with your sole purpose being to understand his daughters needs much better so you can work out how this changes your life…. blah blah words that can all be taken positively yet also end up concluding nothing. It sounds doubtful he’ll meet. Good. Now get others asking and make the meeting bigger and harder to reject. Let’s see how he holds up in front of 10 plus people all curious and interested and only asking questions to understand.
Aside from that, mom needs to…. jeez I dunno. Has she seen evidence the daughter is sick or is she steamroller by this man and quickly becoming isolated from her support? What if you don’t ask her? Tell her that every Wednesday at xx time you’ll be wherever with the kids. You all want her there too. And you’ll stay an hour whether she shows or not. It’s a bit of effort for you, unless you can work it into a sport schedule or something, but no matter your disagreements the kids need a mom. That may be one option to take the decision away from her, and if she’s being isolated you’ve removed her need to comply with him. You’ll be cast as a villain but that’s hardly an issue, especially if it works.
Anyway, the suggestions are just to get your brain into looking for solutions more than seeing problems. You’ve got the courts, good sense, and apparently even the moral right on your side…. you can afford to be seen to do more than required to facilitate amicable relationships for the kids sake.
And so NTA, but YWBTA if you cannot step up for the best outcomes for your kids.
However, I don’t like the pleasure you seem to take in this situation: you come off as spiteful. It’s deeply unimpressive that you are standing on your rights rather than doing everything you can to make sure the children have a relationship with their mother which they need, even with her flaws. You have made no effort to meet them half-way, or to see if there was something you could do to reduce the possibility of allergens coming from your house to theirs. They probably wouldn’t have accepted, but you didn’t even offer. And that’s not a good look is it?
100% NTA.
This guy( ex wife’s next ex husband) is one strange individual.
Are the food particles of what the two boys eat allegedly capable of escaping their bodies and somehow invading the allergic kid’s body?
This appears to be a situation where Husband # 2s kid wants what you lr boys eat but for health reasons can’t. So H 2 wants to exercise control over your boys.
Ef him.
Your ex wife is wrong and she knows she’s wrong. She took you to court and lost.
If anyone is keeping her kids away it is her delulu husband.
Stand your ground. Your ex wife ITAH.
This sounds like a way to isolate his wife and be controlling. Unless you’re lathering them up with peanut butter and other allergens she has he can’t tell you what to feed them when they are with you.
This sounds like something my mother-in-law would do because every other day she was allergic to something new. Though the only time the allergy would have an effect of we mentioned it. And no effect of the subject wasn’t brought up at all.
So unless the kids are bragging about eating things she can’t how does it effect her?
NTA, but you’re likely owed child support. If you have the dates she’s refused her custody available, you’re likely owed back child support. I don’t know your local laws, so check with a professional before running to court, but worth a look.
Even if you don’t need the money, the kids have a legal right to it. You can put it in a long term fund for them if you don’t use it for their care.
Please report to the courts that the mom isn’t taken her time so you can get full custody and child support. NTA.
Making sure they don’t take allergens over is one thing, trying to control what your sons can eat when they are not there is insane.
That said, your ex is a piece of work- what kind of mom won’t see her own kids?
It cound sound like some kind of power play from both sides…
Seems like stepdad is doing his best to isolate his wife from friends and family, and using his daughter’s allergies as a weapon.
now your wife not wanting to see her kids outside her home, that is 100% on her.
NTA
You have the judgments from the other courts for this mess.
The only way that guy can “protect” his kid is to make her live in a bubble.
Then go for full custody. She is alienating herself to accommodate the new guy.